Lee Kuan
Yew.
Singaporean public lament over the death of their founding patriarch
is understandable. Lee was a leader of remarkable talent in taking Singapore
from an important British colonial transport hub to a first world identity in
one generation.
Given Australia’s current floundering government with no
inspiring leader of any political persuasion in sight, any thoughtful person
would be forgiven for thinking that perhaps authoritarian government has many
advantages in advancing ordinary peoples living standards.
There will be many who throw their hands up in the air in
dismay at the very suggestion that dictatorial authority is compatible with democratic
rule, but in Singapore’s case the result is only too plain to see. I’m old
enough to remember Singapore in the early 1950s when I first visited the
island. Admittedly south-east Asia was still in recovery mode after the defeat
of Japan in World War Two, but even then Singapore was nowhere as economically
deprived as its closest neighbours Indonesia and Malay. It’s fortunate geographical
location always ensured a certain degree of prosperity in terms of world trade, but still it was a long way from first world.
Despite the multi-ethnic composition of the population where
each group to some extent was always anxious to advance their own tribal interests,
Lee was able to unite them into a cohesive whole no mean feat when compared to
the history of its neighbours. The Chinese cleansing in Indonesia and several
years of armed conflict in Malay. This most ability to unite was probably Lee's greatest achievement,
the ability to unite people in a complementary vision of their future without
which progress in any field is neigh impossible. Admittedly harsh measure were
from time to time employed, but there is no doubt the majority of Singaporeans
enjoyed eventually a higher standard of living that made the policy worthwhile.
Strangely in the fifties Lee was considered in conservative circles
to be a communist, while today the left of politics consider him to be a right
wing dictator, both sides perusing their own political agendas neither seeming able
to see real benefits in Lee’s rule, each
focusing instead on some restrictive aspect of his government. Many western governments
historically have over the years discredited their political adversaries in
similar manner, while they no longer jail them as in the pas they are often fairly loose with
the truth, freely discrediting their personalities.
Despite some of Lee’s questionable policies, his achievement
have been remarkable taking Singapore’s GDP to levels not obtain in Australia
or many other western first world countries. Turning the island state into a
powerhouse of Asian affairs. Singapore will surely miss his guiding hand.