Eat, Drink
and be Merry, the life of an Epicurean.
The vast
number of food and cooking programmes currently being aired on Australian TV
suggests a huge surge in Epicurean belief. How the Ancient Greek philosopher
became a symbol for over indulgence is difficult to say, certainly the
philosophy of Epicurus has little in bearing on modern day interpretation.
Historically
our present situation offers parallels to the last days of the Roman Republic
after years of civil war, a desertion of religious belief and general lax moral
behaviour. The Roman poet Lucretius popularised Epicurean views on how to live
a pleasurable life. Lucretius, however was driven to suicide at 39, after being
driven mad by an excess of a love philtre. It would appear that he did not take
kindly to Epicurus advice of abstention from sex.
The strange
thing about modern day Epicureans and their fondness for gastronomy and fine
wine is how far removed they are from Epicurus' Philosophy. How a simple
philosophy may be bent and resharpen to meet new masters desires. His true
philosophy revolved around the idea of the human purpose in life was to maximize
pleasure. Not in the sense of living from moment to moment, but to live a life
of full contentment without any nasty after effects. We all have desires of one
sort or another, but we must keep them simple in order to lead a fully happy
life. It is our desire for excessive pleasure that results in our down fall and
discontent.
Epicurus
divided our desires into three compartments. Those considered natural and
necessary for life [food and sleep], things we are unable to do without. Others
he considered natural but not necessary [sex, raising or having children], and
finally those we should avoid at all cost. It is not continuous drinking and
revelling, nor satisfaction of lust, nor the enjoyment of luxuries that produce
a pleasurable life. Rather sober reasoning, searching out the true motives for
all our choices and actions and avoidance and banishment of mere opinion to
which are due the greatest disturbance of the spirit. Epicurus was perfectly happy living on bread and water
with the odd enjoyment of some fine cheese. Excess in all things he felt
produced after effects that did not lead to pleasure. One final point about desire and religion, most religious teaching tell their follows to look forward to the next life for some reward. This is the major problem, whether there is a next world or not, such teaching introduces a pleasure outside our life span. Epicurus did not believe this to be possible as it was beyond life, no doubt this is why he fell into disfavour after the Christianizing of the western world, nor would the Islamic scholars be pleased. After all they where the ones to hand down Classic philosophy to the western world in the 15th cent.
His views on
life were to simply maximize pleasure, without the assertion of extreme
discomfort was best. Only desires that are obtainable lead to full happiness.
Unfulfilled dreams lead to discontent. Religion also was to be avoided as it
taught people to dream of a world beyond the present, a world that did not
exist in terms of now. Resulting in the creation of false hopes, hopes that are
impossible. Insatiability is a disease. It would be fruitful for all of us to
reevaluate our desires in our present materialistic world, were real happiness
is rarely realised due to unfilled desires. Epicurus’ philosophy still has much
to teach us today. It retains a freshness even after 2300 years. The
fundamental condition for happiness is simple sustenance and friendship. One final point about desire in terms of religion. If one looks forwaed to pleasures in the next life, this suggest there is such a place. Epicurus did not beliece this, he felt the only pleasure was in this life, after death there may be another world, but it had no bearing on how you lived your life. The Greek gods were fairly indifferent to human behavour.
No comments:
Post a Comment