Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Tasmanian Wine Industry.


Tasmanian Wine.

Recently the Tasmanian Premier announced in the Mercury [6th March} under the heading “ Grape Expectations” that some $1.2 million was to be made available for further expansion of our viticulture industry. Given that a film of a similar name is currently being shown in local Hobart cinemas, I thought there must be a misprint. It seems extraordinary that so little research has been done to find out what is required to make our Tasmanian’s wine industry hum. This Government effectively stopped many small grape growers from marketing their product direct to the public with the introduction of new licence fees, even though they already held a perpetual licence or so they thought.

The Government needs to take a close look at how the French Government restructured the Beaujolais wine production area in the Southern Rhone villages. Like Tasmania, every farmer made their own wine with uneven results. The Government required all the villages to pool their crop into a semi-Co-op cave [winery] under their control to lift and maintain wine quality. The Beaujolais wines have never looked back.

What does this have to do with Tasmania’s wine industry? Currently we have some 120 odd growers, plus how many hobbyists’ vineyards, and over 170 different labels with a very wide range in terms of quality. Only recently a local grower sold his Riesling grapes to an interstate winemaker, he was shocked to find his fruit had been turned into a sweet wine which was fair enough, but the finished product was marketed as Tasmanian wine, hardly a good advertisement for our wine industry.

 


What does this have to do with Tasmania’s wine industry? Currently we have some 120 odd growers, plus how many hobbyists’ vineyards, and over 170 different labels with a very wide range in terms of quality. Only recently a local grower sold his Riesling grapes to an interstate winemaker, he was shocked to find his fruit had been turned into a sweet wine which was fair enough, but the finished product was marketed as Tasmanian wine, hardly a good advertisement for our wine industry


If Tasmania is serious about lifting our impact on a world market with this $1.2 million grant more research needs to be done on the best way to market and produce a quality product. Like the Beaujolais districts of France, Tasmanian needs an appellation system, were our vine growing regions are classified by soil types, yield, climate [early or late] with a controlled winery for each area. The current larger producers will throw collective arms into the air, but they are not supportive of small growers and charge two to three times to press small amounts of grapes. There are small vineyards in the Southern Rhone region of France that are only two or three acres, but produce fine wine. We need a change of attitude, large is not necessarily better. I see no reason why Government can’t play a decisive role in the establishment of regional wineries with quality control. Over the years various Ministers have told me this is not the Governments’ roll, private enterprise needs to solve their own problems. However, if we look at our Tasmanian Apple Industry when a not dissimilar system existed with every grower marketing their product under their own name. Only when Tasmanian Apples were marketed as Tasmanian product did the industry boom. If small villages in France can do it why can’t Tasmania.

No comments: